For years, critics have sounded alarms about ActBlue—the Democratic Party’s online fundraising powerhouse—and its dubious handling of small-dollar donations. Legacy media dismissed the warnings as conspiracy theory. The platform, we were told, was simply a grassroots marvel. But now, the curtain is being pulled back. And what’s being revealed isn’t savvy campaign strategy—it’s the anatomy of a potential criminal enterprise.
According to new reports confirmed by The New York Post, top ActBlue officials have been subpoenaed by Congress. These are not voluntary interviews. They are legal demands for testimony under oath, triggered by what lawmakers are now calling widespread fraud—fraud that allegedly includes the use of stolen identities, foreign funds, and illegal coordination with taxpayer-funded organizations like USAID.
The investigation, greenlit by President Trump and spearheaded by Attorney General Pam Bondi, is rapidly expanding. The DOJ is now running a full-scale probe into what appears to be a years-long scheme: foreign nationals funneling money into U.S. elections via “dummy” donations using unaware Americans’ personal data. That’s not just unethical. That’s federal election fraud.
And it’s not just hearsay.
According to internal findings, multiple U.S. citizens—who never gave a dime to Democrat campaigns—found their names and addresses listed as donors. One former nuclear scientist, Matt Van Swol, discovered nine separate ActBlue donations in his name to candidates in Kansas. He doesn’t even live there. The donor records showed gibberish job titles and fake metadata. It wasn’t sloppy bookkeeping—it looked like an operation running at scale, designed to bypass scrutiny.
ACTBLUE MUST FACE CONGRESS AFTER MASSIVE FRAUD & FOREIGN ELECTION FUNDING DOJ PROBE. ActBlue officials have been subpoenaed and are now legally obligated to testify before Congress over years of enormous fraud regarding their fundraising platform directly connected to the… pic.twitter.com/JtN6WdemvF
— The SCIF (@TheIntelSCIF) June 26, 2025
Even more alarming is the web of connections that lead back to USAID. Billions in taxpayer funds flowed through Democrat-aligned NGOs, and some of that money reportedly reappeared—cleaned and rebranded—as ActBlue “donations.” Seven top executives at ActBlue quietly resigned as pressure mounted, while Biden’s Treasury Department stonewalled congressional requests for internal records.
What we are seeing now is the scaffolding of an enterprise designed to disguise its true nature. ActBlue cloaked itself in the language of democracy—grassroots, small dollar, people-powered—but the structure underneath may have been laundering money, violating election laws, and leveraging federal agencies in the process.
This isn’t a political scandal. It’s a legal one.
The subpoenas issued to a current senior workflow specialist and former VP of customer service Alyssa Twomey are just the beginning. The DOJ has been ordered to produce a full report within 180 days. And House Oversight, Judiciary, and Administration Committees are demanding answers—publicly and under oath.
The truth? This story is no longer about suspicious donation patterns. It’s about the potential dismantling of one of the Democratic Party’s most protected institutions.
For years, “small dollar donations” were the shield. They were presented as the proof that the left had built a people-powered movement. But now, as evidence mounts, that shield looks more like a cover—a facade built to hide systematic abuse of campaign finance laws, public trust, and the American voter.
The facts are sobering:
-
Foreign IPs linked to ActBlue donations.
-
USAID funds traced to Dem-aligned NGOs, then to ActBlue.
-
Stolen identities and gibberish data tied to thousands of donations.
-
DOJ involvement, executive resignations, and high-level subpoenas.
If this had occurred within a Republican fundraising network, there would already be headlines calling for arrests. Instead, the legacy media’s silence has only amplified the urgency—and the magnitude—of the unfolding investigation.
What began as suspicion is turning into confirmation. And what was dismissed as theory is now landing in courtrooms.
The question is no longer whether ActBlue bent the rules. It’s whether those rules were obliterated—on purpose—and whether anyone will be held accountable.
