Tensions inside the House of Representatives are escalating again, with Rep. Nancy Mace moving to expel a fellow Republican in a dispute that is quickly turning personal and procedural at the same time. On Monday evening, the South Carolina lawmaker filed a resolution targeting Rep. Cory Mills of Florida, laying out a series of allegations that range from misconduct claims to questions about his background and official conduct.
The resolution itself is not privileged, meaning it does not automatically trigger a vote. However, Mace retains the option to force the issue onto the House floor at a later stage, setting up the possibility of a high-profile showdown that would require a two-thirds majority to succeed.
Mace’s filing accuses Mills of misrepresenting aspects of his military service, engaging in sexual misconduct, violating campaign finance laws, and improperly involving himself in federal contracts while serving in Congress. The move follows reports that Mills had been preparing a similar effort aimed at removing Mace, adding a layer of direct political retaliation to the situation.
Public statements from Mace reflect that dynamic. She framed her actions as both personal and procedural, writing that she intends to confront wrongdoing while suggesting Mills’ response is driven by self-preservation. The exchange has pushed what might otherwise remain within committee review into a broader public conflict.
Mills, who is seeking a third term and has received an endorsement from President Donald Trump, has denied wrongdoing in connection with multiple allegations that have surfaced in recent months. These include claims involving a former relationship and a separate incident that drew a law enforcement response in Washington, D.C. Despite the scrutiny, no criminal charges have been filed.
Within the House, the response has been cautious. Lawmakers from both parties have acknowledged the seriousness of the allegations but have largely avoided calling for immediate expulsion. Some, like Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, have indicated that any decision should hinge on clear evidence of misconduct rather than accusations alone.
This is not the first clash between Mace and Mills. A previous effort by Mace in late 2025 to censure Mills and remove him from committee assignments failed decisively, with the House instead referring the matter to the Ethics Committee. That panel is continuing its investigation, which includes reviewing allegations related to personal conduct and the accuracy of Mills’ public record.
House leadership has signaled a preference for allowing that process to run its course. Speaker Mike Johnson has reiterated that position, indicating that internal investigations should be completed before the chamber considers more severe disciplinary measures.
The Ethics Committee confirmed this week that its inquiry, launched in November 2025, remains active. As is typical, the panel has not provided a timeline for its conclusion.
