Tapes Released by House Judiciary Paint Troublesome Picture of Biden

Every so often, a series of developments arrives that prompts people to revisit arguments they thought had been settled years earlier. This week has been one of those moments.

Much of the attention has centered on newly public material related to Dr. Anthony Fauci, including personal writings that critics argue contradict some of his public statements during the COVID-19 pandemic. Those documents have fueled renewed debate over everything from the virus’s origins to Fauci’s public role during the crisis.

Amid that flood of headlines, another story has received comparatively less attention: the release of audio recordings featuring then-former Vice President Joe Biden discussing classified documents with his ghostwriter while working on his 2017 memoir, Promise Me, Dad.


The recordings, released by Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee, stem from interviews Biden conducted with writer Mark Zwonitzer in 2016 and 2017 as the book was being prepared.

Much of the discussion focuses on Biden’s recollections of events from his vice presidency. At several points, however, the conversations also touch on documents that Biden himself acknowledged could be classified.

According to the recordings, Biden remarked, “The next thing I have here is classified.”

In another exchange, he said, “Some of this may be classified…”

He later added, “It’s not marked classified, but…” before trailing off.


No classified information ultimately appeared in the published memoir. Nevertheless, the recordings became part of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s investigation into Biden’s handling of classified documents after leaving office.

The audio has also drawn attention because of Biden’s speaking style during the interviews.

The Daily Mail reported that in one session, Biden struggled to respond for an extended period until prompted by Zwonitzer, who reminded him about issues involving Iraq, Ukraine, and Central America that had occupied much of his time as vice president. According to the report, Biden then responded haltingly before recalling conversations involving then-House Republican leadership.

For critics, the recordings stand in contrast to years of public assurances from Biden’s allies that concerns about his mental sharpness were overstated. Throughout his presidency, questions about his age and cognitive abilities frequently became political flashpoints, with supporters arguing that selectively edited clips misrepresented his performance while opponents pointed to repeated verbal missteps as evidence of decline.


Those issues also became central to Hur’s final report.

After concluding that evidence existed showing Biden had retained classified documents, Hur ultimately declined to recommend criminal charges. In explaining that decision, he wrote that a jury would likely view Biden as “a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory.”

The White House strongly objected to that characterization when the report was released, disputing Hur’s assessment of Biden’s memory while also rejecting broader criticisms of the president’s mental fitness.


The newly released recordings have revived debate over whether that description accurately reflected Biden’s condition years before he entered the White House.

Supporters of the former president argue that occasional memory lapses do not establish criminal intent or incapacity. Critics contend the recordings reinforce concerns that were dismissed for years despite visible signs that, in their view, warranted greater scrutiny.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here